Evidence & Sources
How the record is supported
A public guide to the evidence labels, source types and publication rules used across this site.
How evidence works here
Factual statements on this site are recorded as separate claims, each linked to the sources that support it. A claim states one fact, so each fact carries its own level of support.
Every claim has an evidence label. The label describes the support behind the claim, not certainty about it, and it is not a judgement of political merit.
Sources differ in kind. Some are primary records from the institution or body involved, such as a hospital or the electoral commission. Most are published reports. Others may be first-party material from his own organisations. Each source is labelled by type and by class.
Publishing a claim does not remove its uncertainty: a reported claim stays reported after it appears here. A claim can also stay unpublished while it is reviewed, or because its support does not yet meet this standard. Pages on this site show only claims approved for publication.
What the labels mean
Each label describes the kind of support behind a claim. Unverified and Disputed are not currently used on any page, but they belong to the same vocabulary.
- Verified
- Supported by a primary record: a document or statement from the institution or body directly involved. It describes how the claim is documented; it does not mean the record cannot contain errors.
- Independently corroborated
- Supported by at least two sources that appear to have reported separately. Stronger than a single report, but not a primary record.
- Reported
- Supported by published reporting, or by his own account as reported. It does not mean doubtful or false; it describes the kind of support available.
- First-party record
- Comes from his own organisations or another directly interested party. It is not treated as unreliable, but it is not independent confirmation.
- Unverified
- A claim has been made, but sufficient support for it has not yet been confirmed.
- Disputed
- The claim itself is materially contested or challenged. The label records the conflict; it does not settle it.
Evidence and proposals are different
Evidence labels apply only to claims about what has already happened. Statements about the future are classified differently: as a policy proposal, a political target, a working assumption or a recommendation.
The two vocabularies never mix. A proposal is not "verified" because it appears in an official document. An evidence label answers what supports a factual claim; a policy classification answers what kind of commitment a statement about the future is.
Sources
Every source behind the claims shown on this site's pages, grouped by class. A source is listed when a published page uses a claim it supports. Each entry links to the original and to the pages that use it.
Primary records3
Published reporting12
KF-SRC-0003
Group trains 119 youths to boost Plateau’s creative industry (external site)
KF-SRC-0013
Kefas Ropsik Emerges Plateau PDP Guber Candidate, Pledges To Serve One-Term (external site)
KF-SRC-0015
Ropshik Wins PDP Governorship Primary In Plateau, Promises One-Term Tenure (external site)
KF-SRC-0016
KF-SRC-0014
Ropshik Emerges Plateau PDP Governorship Candidate, Pledges Single Term in Office (external site)
KF-SRC-0008
Kefas Ropshik rewards excellence, calls for improved welfare for Nigerian doctors (external site)
KF-SRC-0007
KF-SRC-0012
Ropshik wins Plateau PDP governorship primary (external site)
KF-SRC-0017
KF-SRC-0006
Kefas Ropshik inspires doctors with advocacy, philanthropy at JUTH (external site)
KF-SRC-0004
119 Plateau youths trained in diverse skills for self-employment (external site)
KF-SRC-0009
Philanthropist Ropshik help 43 inmates regain freedom in Jos Prison. (external site)
What is not published
Research notes are not published. Source and claim records also hold internal working material, such as how a source was obtained or how far its coverage overlaps with other reports. That material supports review; it is not part of the public record.
Some leads stay unpublished because their support is incomplete or has not been reviewed. Publication is an editorial decision about what is ready to appear. It is not an evidence label, and it does not change a claim's support.
